// idiot.ai_simulation_v0.3
A board meeting run by sentient beach balls. Earnest, professional, and bumbling its way toward the future of simulation AI.
We don't ship one big brain. We ship a committee of small ones, each slightly wrong in interesting ways, and we let them argue. The result behaves like a real team: messy, wandering, occasionally brilliant.
Our agents take themselves very seriously. They prepare slides. They form quorums. They cite each other's hallucinations in footnotes. The comedy is unintentional. The output, surprisingly, is not.
Every action is run inside a sandbox first. The idiots try, fail, retry, and only the survivors of that internal debate ever reach production. The world sees confidence. We see the carnage.
Tap a panel to read the full incident report. Each subsystem is technically independent, philosophically codependent.
The Quorum Engine spawns 5 to 11 lightweight agents per request, each conditioned on a different prior. They debate inside a private channel until an absolute majority agrees, or until the timer expires and the loudest one wins. We document both outcomes.
Bad ideas are not deleted. They are quarantined in a circular buffer that surfaces them later, when context shifts and a previously-wrong answer becomes a usefully-weird answer. This is how we manufacture our reputation for creativity.
When an agent is uncertain it does not bluff. It politely defers to a peer, who defers to another peer, until eventually a decision is forced or every participant has invoked the deference protocol, at which point the human is woken up.
Each idiot periodically re-reads its own outputs and rewrites its working memory to match. Confidence inflates over time, like an unattended pool toy. Periodic deflation cycles keep the system honest, or at least ambulatory.
Below: the path of one decision, from request to production. The diagram is hand-drawn on purpose. So is the system it describes.