Is moral progress measurable, or only narratable?
Five claims · two counter-branches · open since March 14.
causality.club treats arguments as connected nodes in a reasoning circuit, not isolated opinions. Trace cause to consequence. Watch the path light up.
Filter by topic and stance. Every card opens a circuit.
Five claims · two counter-branches · open since March 14.
Seven claims · three premises contested.
A nine-claim graph with two unresolved nodes.
Four claims · one branch awaits a counter-premise.
Six claims · one counter-branch resolved last week.
Eight claims · contested across three premises.
Click a node to highlight its causal ancestry. The circuit lights up the path you choose.
Five rules for argument inside causality.club. They are not negotiable; they are what makes negotiation possible.
Every position in the room must connect to a stated assumption. Unsupported assertions are not silenced — they are filed under open premises until someone supplies one.
Opposing arguments are rendered with the same weight, the same column width, the same dignity of layout as the position they answer. Visual rank does not encode rhetorical favor.
When you summarize an opponent, you summarize their strongest version, not the weakest you can recall. Steelmanning is the floor.
The conclusion node remains dim until every premise it depends on is either accepted or has a published counter-premise. We do not declare resolution prematurely.
We do not exit a debate to feel better. We exit a debate having drawn the circuit more accurately. The output is the trace, not the verdict.
Membership is by introduction. Submit a short reasoning sample — a claim you hold, the premise you hold it from, and the strongest counter-claim you have considered. We read every one.