ethica.dev

questions that refuse to resolve

A curated collection of ethical dilemmas, moral paradoxes, and philosophical edge-cases presented as interactive case studies for the thoughtful mind.

Case 01

The Trolley Variation

You discover the trolley problem has a third track that leads back to you. The lever is warm. Does proximity to consequence change the moral weight of inaction?

Case 02

Memory Debt

If you could erase the memory of a harm you caused, but the victim retains theirs, have you reduced suffering or merely redistributed guilt?

Case 03

The Honest Machine

An AI tells you an uncomfortable truth you have been avoiding. You know it is right. Does the source of truth affect its moral authority? Can silicon bear witness?

Case 04

Inherited Obligation

Your ancestor made a promise to a stranger descendant. Neither party chose this covenant. The descendant arrives at your door. What do you owe the dead?

Case 05

The Compassion Paradox

A doctor can save five patients with organs from one healthy visitor. The utilitarian calculus is clear. Yet every moral intuition revolts. Is disgust a form of moral reasoning, or merely its obstacle? The ward is quiet. The visitor is reading a magazine.

Case 06

Selective Mercy

You can forgive one of two people who wronged you equally. The act of choosing makes forgiveness itself conditional. Does partial mercy corrupt the whole?

Case 07

The Last Lie

A dying friend asks if their life mattered. You believe it did not, not in any grand sense. But the room is small and the hours are few. What is kindness without honesty?

Case 08

Consent of the Unborn

You make decisions that will affect people who do not yet exist. They cannot consent, object, or negotiate. By what authority do we bind the future?

Case 09

The Observer Complicity

You witness an injustice through a screen. You record it, share it, discuss it at dinner. The victim remains in the frame. At what point does witnessing become consumption? Your attention is a currency someone else is spending.

Method

Each case is presented without resolution. There are no correct answers here, only the texture of the question itself. We believe that ethical reasoning is not a destination but a practice: the repeated encounter with situations that resist simplification.

The cases are drawn from classical philosophy, contemporary technology ethics, and the quiet dilemmas of ordinary life. They are arranged not by theme but by the kind of discomfort they produce.

01 No case has a solution.
02 Discomfort is a feature.
03 The observer is always implicated.